Colorado's Proposition 105, on the current ballot, would require labeling of certain foods containing "genetically modified organisms" (GMOs). Vermont started requiring such labeling earlier this year.
The "no," anti-labeling forces have spent $11.2 million, filling my mailbox with billboard-size brochures. The "yes" group, "Right to Know Colorado" has spent less than $500,000.
The "no" people would like to say two things, but there is a slight contradiction between them.
1. "Genetically modified foods are perfectly nutritious and represent an advancement in agriculture."
2. "You — the person who buys and eats them — should not be informed that you are indeed eating them, because . . . . "
. . . exactly why, they can't really say, so there is a lot of smoke and mirrors and hand-waving and "Look over there!" coming from the people with the millions to spend.
Watch out! Requiring an extra line of type on the label will require a "huge bureaucracy." It will represent "unreliable information" (Like, how?) It will be "arbitrary" (Aren't all laws arbitrary?).
And so on. Look over there, here comes a huge bureaucracy!
No information. No argument based on logic. (You will find the nearest thing to that in the comments here.) Just scare tactics. And lots of Monsanto money.
No comments:
Post a Comment