Granted, North America has more wide-open spaces for turbines, but I could see something similar happening here too.
Meanwhile another British study shows that the real money in wind farms is not so much selling electricity as it is selling the "renewables obligation certificates" to owners of fossil fuel-burning power plants.
Quite often windy periods come when demand is low, as in the middle of the night. Wind power nonetheless forces its way onto the grid, as wind-farm operators make most of their money not from selling electricity but from selling the renewables obligation certificates (ROCs) which they obtain for putting power onto the grid. Companies supplying power to end users in the UK must obtain a certain amount of ROCs by law or pay a "buy-out" fine: as a result ROCs can be sold for money to end-use suppliers.And that comes from a study funded by the John Muir Trust.
Mega-renewable energy projects seem to be mostly about gaming the system, whether it's wind turbines in Scotland or huge solar projects in American deserts, built because the voters demanded "green energy," and big utility companies build big projects.
Solar panels belong on the end users' rooftops.
1 comment:
I read that the Air Force Academy's big solar project has a longer payback time than the expected lifetime of its solar panels. Your tax dollars at work...
Post a Comment