Back in the 1980s, two New Jersey professors raised a ruckus on the High Plains by arguing that, given falling populations and the gradual depletion of the
Ogallala Aquifer, the plains should be given over to some combination of parks and a different, non-irrigated agriculture including buffalo ranching, activities that would support a smaller but sustainable population—a concept known as the
Buffalo Commons.
Few people wanted to hear that. Not only was it coming from New Jersey professors who by definition could not know anything about anything, but it was a slap in the face to the whole survivor mythos of the High Plains—that the people there had survived grasshopper plagues, droughts, blizzards, the Dust Bowl of the 1930s, ups and downs in commodity prices, isolation, and indeed, a gradual decline from the "good years," the first two decades of the 20th century. In general, they reacted angrily to the proposal that they "surrender."
But population was falling:
Their continuing research showed that hundreds of counties in the
American West still have less than a sparse 6 persons per square mile —
the density standard Frederick Jackson Turner used to declare the
American Frontier closed in 1893. Many have less than 2 persons per
square mile.
The frontier never came close to disappearing, and in fact has
expanded in the Plains in recent years. The 1980 Census showed 388
frontier counties west of the Mississippi. The 1990 Census shows 397
counties in frontier status, and the 2000 Census showed 402. Most of
this frontier expansion is in the Great Plains. Kansas actually has more
land in frontier status than it did in 1890.
My personal connection
: in the early 1920s, the era of prosperity, my maternal grandparents as a young couple ran a store in the High Plains town of
Arriba, Colorado (pr. "AIR-a-buh"). When I saw Arriba in the 1970s, it had no business district at all except a Flying J truck stop and an antiques store. Now there is a wind farm too. My grandparents got out before the collapse, but it caught up to them elsewhere.
Meanwhile, the professors, Frank and Deborah Popper, geographer and urban planner (yes, ironic)
have not given up on the Buffalo Commons idea.
At a recent conference in Salina, Kansas, Frank Popper said, "We never really expected it to have the impact it did and does. We
would have recoiled then that we would still be talking about it 23
years later. It's clear that in the intervening years a quiet muscle of
reality, a lot of the trends we saw in the depopulation of the Plains
has continued."
"I've been accused of having a slightly un-American approach to the
land and the environment, where growth is not always the be-all and
end-all, where growth can go too far, and the Buffalo Commons implies a
quietism or defeatism," Frank Popper said. "Instead, the Buffalo Commons
implies too much growth can be a mistake, overburdening the land,
overmastering the environment and in the end always getting kicked in
the rear or the pocketbook--or someplace else.
"I realize there is a social comedy in two people from back east who
are telling people in the Plains what to do with their land. I've
enjoyed it, but there are important things to look at in how we treat
this vast, characteristically American chunk of land. There are lessons
here on how to live on the land that can be applied to the Corn Belt,
the lower Mississippi delta, and parts of our largest cities--like
Detroit--that are depopulating like the Plains. It's about
sustainability. It's about being American."
Some politicians are quietly coming around,
he notes, and a Great Plains National Park "may actually happen."